VPN: GV-R567D3-1GI
Product ReviewsGIGABYTE Radeon HD 5670 GV-R567D3-1GI Video Card
|
80%
0%
10%
0%
10%
|
With 10 User Reviews
|
 Rating: Review Date: 06/29/13 |
|
|
Rating: Review Date: 05/17/13 |
Comment:
Very affordable cost, Actually great card, for it being a medium range. I believe it was the ideal obtain I've created with a card. Enhanced my gaming power by 25% I had a HD 4650 1GB prior to this, and it's a main improvement, if you're upgrading from a Nvidia 220 GT or a HD 4650 you won't go incorrect with this. None. Works ideal. |
|
Rating: Review Date: 04/06/13 |
Comment:
The card appears excellent its plenty quiet, the value was suitable. It was a large step from my hd3200 integrated. I haven't had any. Ill post if I do. It brought my Windows score from three.three to 5.9(processor getting the new low) 6.eight for the graphics. |
|
Rating: Review Date: 11/19/12 |
Comment:
It's a decent card for the price tag. It was a replacement for my Nvidia XLR8 8800GTS 320mb that died about a week ago. The performance isn't as great as the XLR8 8800GTS but I guess that was to be expected with the cost. It's not the finest card for newer games, it had difficulty operating Poor Organization two and Farcry two. If you're serious about your gaming, you might want to appear into a superior card. Windows 7 Professional ࿀-bit)AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 Dual-Core two.eight GHz4096mb of RAM1280x1024 Resolution |
|
Rating: Review Date: 07/19/12 |
Comment:
A little, quiet card. Stays cool and quiet all the time. For it's size and low power consumption, this card performs very well. None that I can detect so far. I have never ever bought a Gigabyte brand video card, so we'll see how long it will last. I purchased this card as an upgrade from an Nvidia Geforce 9600 GT. Yes, this card does have a greater core clock and does have a larger memory speed, but as far as overall performance, this card is almost identical to the 9600. Nevertheless, this card does NOT require an added 12v input and is a lot smaller than the 9600 and stays quieter and cooler than the 9600. Taking into consideration the resources that it makes use of, this card performs really impressively. If you are searching for a spending budget card for general purpose gaming (Star Trek Online, Planet of Warcraft, etc.) really feel confident in this card. I am employing this card in conjunction with a quad-core processor so my gaming is Quite smooth. If you are using this card for FPS gaming or something equivalent, this card will do ok, but there are far better cards out there HD, 6870 HD, 6970 HD). You will get the larger frame rate you want to win at those variety of games working with larger cards. If you are on a price range, or using it for non-fps purposes, this card is a good decision. |
|
Rating: Review Date: 06/30/12 |
Comment:
None. I've owned this card for longer now and it's starting to mess up, I get a boot error when attempting to start off the personal computer (doesn't do it with other card) and I am only receiving 20-30 FPS in Team Fortress two which isn't a demanding game. Not happy with this card, was considering acquiring one more card but it's going to be around บ to ship it back to Newegg and there's also a ป re-stocking fee that I didn't know about when I ordered. Speaking to a consumer service person tomorrow, hopefully this will be resolved. |
|
Rating: Review Date: 05/20/12 |
Comment:
This card replaced a Biostar card that had continuous "video driver has stopped responding" crashes in Window 7 Ultimate - 64 bit. This card installed and has run flawlessly. I am not a gamer but I do have an ATI Wonder Tv tuner and watch video in Windows Media Center with it. Video has been crisp. Extremely pleased with obtain. None so far Using the VGA out due to the fact I run the video through a KVM switch.Host Mobo: Asus P6T, i7-920 processor, 6GB 1600 MHz RAM, Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit |
|
Rating: Review Date: 02/28/12 |
Comment:
It's quiet, it plays Lord of the Rings On the web HD version with almost everything set to highest achievable settings at 30+ fps. It's not big (though I can't say that it would fit in a compact case mainly because of the significant fan on top rated. And, it stays fairly cool (below 50C) even even though playing graphics intensive games. Nothing actually with the card, except that overclocking it doesn't really seem to do a whole lot. I haven't in fact tested it with any benchmarking software program like 3Dmark or anything like that, so I don't know. All that stated, out of the box, it's been great. One thing to be careful of if you're a 1st-time upgrader: make sure you have at least a 450W power provide to run this card. It was an added expense I wasn't counting on, but I lucked out simply because I got a very good deal on a power provide (thank you shell-shocker!), so it ended up ok. If you have a sub-450W power provide, strategy on that as an additional expense. |
|
Rating: Review Date: 10/25/11 |
Comment:
Bang-for-your-buck is amazingATI's MLAA lets you get edge smoothing related to antialiasing without taking as massive of a framerate hitGood efficiency in most games (especially ones from 2009 and earlier)Stays cool, extremely quietReally low power usageNo extra power to be plugged in, runs on PCI power only Haven't found any but I've been playing games like Left four Dead, L4D2, and other Source engine titles on max detail settings at 1680x1050. Unreal engine games (Batman: Arkham Asylum, SWAT 4, Bioshock, Mass Effect, Bulletstorm) and Gamebryo engine games (Divinity II, Fallout New Vegas, Oblivion) have all run really well on this, even at max or near-max particulars. You can't always play on high on the very most current games, but you can play on some level of detail with a smooth framerate. I switched from a power-guzzling Radeon 4890 to this one. Low power usage plus very satisfactory game performance have created this a real winner. I'd advocate these cards for the following scenarios:-Secondary/lan pc-House theater PC-Gamers on a spending budget who can live with no absolute max particulars on the most current games (but highest detail in virtually something 2009 or older) |
|
Rating: Review Date: 07/21/11 |
Comment:
For the cash seems like a great card. Scores 6.8 on the Windows 7 built-in benchmark. not certain however if related(probably not), but I can't get this card to come out of sleep. For the performance versus cash, this chip appears like a superior location to be. |
Wonderful; Power, NO want for an Added Power SupplyRUNS Battlefield Undesirable Company Max'd out @ decent res identical with Empire Total War. It bests my old 4830?... They didn't make it a year ago... Perhaps it beats the 4830, mainly because I added one more 2gb1066 this upgrade.. Nonetheless although max overclocked the 4830 but this ) is on stock settings...amd x2 ii 250 3.39ghzasus m4a785m2gb muskin 1066 gb kingston 1066 Generic PSU from a quad-core walmart Dell