AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition 3.2GHz Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor

Comment:
I certainly love this factor. It overclocks like a champ. I currently have mine running at 4GHz ྴx 200MHz) established stable at 1.428V on air cooling. It totally dominates whatever i toss at it. Gaming at 1080p? Cake. Encoding 720 or 1080p video? Pft, no sweat. I honestly regret not finding it sooner than i did. I can't legally marry it =( Method setup:Azza Solano 1000 ATX Complete Compter CaseASUS M4A87TD EVO MoboPhenom II x6 1090T @ 4GHzG. Skill Ripjaw Series 4GB ƒx 2GB) DDR3-1600 MemoryCorsair GS700 700W Power SupplyRadeon HD 6870 Video cardWD 320GB SATA Primary HDDWD 1TB SATA Storage HDD

Comment:
Seriously rapid CPUPerfect for multitasking and gamingUnlocked MultiplierLow-cost for six coresWonderful overclocker -I have mine OC'd at 3.9Ghz stable. I could go greater but i like a cool program. (Corsair H70 HS) Nope My method- Haf 932- Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5- Amd 1090t @ 3.9Ghz- G.ability 8Gb Ɣ x 2Gb) 1600 Memory- Ocz Vertex two 120 Gb SSD -boot- 1tb Western Digital Black- 2tb Western Digital Green- Radeon HD 6870 1Gb

Comment:
Pretty speedy it keeps cool so lots of room for overclocking with an aftermarket air cooler. Its what I anticipated. Even though this is a very good CPU for the cash I would save up for an i7 950 and above they run more quickly with less hiccups Would use this in an additional price range create

Comment:
The 1090T isn't the FASTEST obtainable, but when you think about saving money and then the OC prospective...who cares?! I have observed these OC to 4Ghz incredibly stable on AIR. I have noticed equivalent outcomes. Finest cost/performance worth on a certain CPU bench internet site! Lets face it...AMD X6's are acquiring stomped by the quad i7's on the CPU charts...My fanboy status kept me on board with AMD for this build. But to say stomped would be an understatement... Hey, Intel doesn't present a 6-core at this cost range. Despite receiving SPANKED in the CPU charts by the i7 quads, this processor rated the Greatest for value/performance worth, beating the i7 2600k in that regard. Can't argue with that!

Comment:
It works and it's fast and it's inexpensive. none When selecting a processor for gaming I would typically recommend this processor, but with the new Intel Sandy Bridge line that's changing. I would've gone with the i5-2500K, but the motherboards that support it are nevertheless new and very expensive, so I'll wait. I genuinely like that AMD doesn't alter the socket size/specs that usually. This also makes it less difficult to upgrade later.

Comment:
Speed Speed Speedhandles every thing point I can throw at it.No require to increase the multiplier nevertheless. None

Comment:
uncomplicated to install, impressive stock heatsink/fan. havent been able to max it out but. quite quick processor, having two downloads, an upload, a DVD, and a disc-game playing all at the identical time only utilised 25% of the processor, with the most processes on cores and 1. no glitches in any of the applications running, and only at 40c immediately after 1 hour of all the above actions operating simultaniously.

Comment:
Runs fast and cool with stock heatsink and fan. Handles everything I throw at it. None

Comment:
Due to the fact I've built my desktop for high-finish video editing, I can safely say the ideal part is its 6 cores. I'm not saying I've utilised all cores, but it's excellent to know there's extra energy keeping my technique up and running. For instance, Turbo Core technology is a very impressive trick that bumps up usage for Adobe CS5 by a a lot higher loading rate and faster speeds across the board. Any heavy-duty application, it improves drastically with this feature. AMD64 indicates I can run my high-end software program and still retain a thing lightweight that only desires 32-bit binary as an alternative at the identical time. But you already knew that. Its Cool'n'Quiet function is really extremely impressive; it keeps the processor literally 5ㅂ degrees Celsius colder than in its standard state, all whilst holding on to plenty of its efficiency potential. With all the characteristics added on, it stacks up to Intel processors in its personal way. I fully grasp Intel has a lot more quickly processing speeds, but for general efficiency, AMD destroys. It doesn't have SSE 4 extensions. Now, this is in fact a extremely miniscule complaint, just give me a likelihood. When I want to use a unique plugin for specific video editing software program that is easily instructed by SSE 4, AMD is sadly a bit clumsier in time than an Intel processor would be. But once more, this is extremely smaller, due to the fact AMD still loads it only about ten% slower. And once again, this would only pertain to specific applications and usually not gaming or middle-finish items. I assure you, this is barely a problem to me, and even so, I knew it didn't have SSE4 directions in the 1st location, so it's my personal darn fault. An additional complaint is about the heatsink. Now, I've place on a heatsink just before, but this point is troublesome. It took me literally 15 full minutes to get the bracket pushed down and then tighten it. Other than this, and the truth that the driver CD comes with AMD Core Line, an annoying "essential" dock that you can at least uninstall, it has outstanding capability. I adore it! Effectively, for starters, the technology AMD delivers is wonderful for the average to high range personal computer builder, but Intel certainly has more quickly processors and larger numbers on the benchmarks. For my profession, Hyperthreading would be a nifty function, and once again SSE4 directions would make my perform a tad bit much easier. But who am I kidding? For the value I paid, I only would've gotten a weak i5 quad-core, and this 6-core has in fact beaten Intel quadcores in most of its benchmarks. I can't argue with the price tag either. It's a amazing bundle for any personal computer builder, specifically these who are on a price range. AMD Phenom II X6 1090TG.Ability 1333 ƒ x 4gbꊨ GB Western Digital Caviar Black 6 GB/sAsrock 870 Extreme3Rosewill Black Gaming CaseRaidmax Blackstone 700W AC PSU

Comment:
8Gb ram @ 1604 MHz and this cpu @ four.2GHz with a 20$ aftermarket heatsink and fan. 21.five*C idle temp and now three hours into operating overdrive stability test, prime 95 blend burn test, converting 700+Gb of high deff video, listening to itunes, and writting this assessment. almost everything is nonetheless quick and my cpu temp is 42*C. Thats what i call Acquiring MY MONEYS WORTH.pulled up a 7.6 cpu rating on the Windows Knowledge Index The stock cooler is junk.... but it is carrying out a fantastic job of keeping my frankenstine X-box from overheating. Wanted an aftermarket cooler going in.. so if your going to overclock, count on to get 1. if not then the stock cooler is ideal. going to buy another to put in the laptop or computer im developing my brothernewegg shipped to my door in three days! everything great condition!

Comment:
6 Cores. Smoking rapid. Shreds data intensive tasks like its 2012. Outstanding deal. Do yourself a favor and get greater fan. The OEM fan is incredibly loud. This CPU deserved much better cooling program What are you waiting for? This is 1 of the greatest CPU offers out there.

Comment:
Simple to overclock to 4GHZ, heat is not an situation because I water cool. You can't beat the value. None It is tough to locate great sources for support in overclocking. My rig is: Asus Crosshair IV Ext / Phenom II X6 1090T (OCed to 4G) / 4GB Corsair ram (DDR3-1600) / 3 x ATI HD4850 in Xfire (all 3 water cooled. I have the cpu stable 24ǝ at 4G with multiplyer @ 20 and CPU V @ 1.488 // Ram @ 1600 1.65V.

Comment:
Issues with it fantastic cpu for the cost!! none

Comment:
Handles fairly much anything I throw at it on stock speeds, but has wonderful overclock possible as properly. Currently on a modest overclock of three.8 with no voltage boost. Stock cooler is needlessly loud and not extremely very good for overclocking. Knew that going in, not worth an egg. The new sandy bridge i5 deliver equal if not far better efficiency for similar costs. Didn't go that route since I wanted to re-use my motherboard and RAM. Made superior sense financially for me, but not necessarily the fastest chip for the funds. To the guy beneath talking about WoW, that is most likely a graphics card issue. the 6870 is a respectable card, but WoW performs poorly on the newest Radeons. Make sure you update your graphics drivers. It could also be that WoW isn't all that good at multithreading, so it performs greater on a modest number of highly clocked cores than on a large quantity of low-clocked cores. Having six cores only assists if applications truly use them, following all. A light overclock could go a long way in that case.

Comment:
Good value, fantastic speed and 6 cores!!! What are you waiting for, hit add to cart! None as of however.

Comment:
4ghz ya! none

Comment:
Great so far. Some of my newer games had been working with 100% processor on my old cpu (intel core two duo two.5Ghz) according to job manager. Now the exact same games don't go above 40% cpu use. The stock fan is a tiny louder than my old intel. Not really a con although since it's not annoying loud. So far im glad I produced the switch to AMD.

Comment:
multi threads extremely wellgreat for gamestons of horse powerwas able to run many committed servers on this cpu, and it had plently of power for it. it was paired with 16GB RAM. I sold it for a new Intel 2600K. undertaking hashed rainbow table encryptions the AMD X6 with two netbooks with intel atoms single cores in a single month did 35,000 points, and the intel 2600K @ 4.5 with out the netbooks took 2 days to do 55,000 points, in the final handful of days it has completed 220,000 points & not even running 24ǝ. if you have the funds, i suggest a Intel 2600KIm a major fan of AMD/ATI, and had a 6970 2GB paired with my AMD X6, and use to have a AMD FX-55, a 迀 CPU, and appreciate these guys, but I appear to be a larger fan of Intel & Nvidia & I have more than ten years of gaming knowledge, with the greatest and most recent games, up to 16 hours a day of gaming on the weeks too. adequate to give you eye problems for the rest of your life.

Comment:
Processor shreds although items idles at 27C and 48C below 50% load have yet to be in a position to push past 50% load unless doing stress testing. Installed windows 7 in beneath 20 mins on a ten,000 rpm drive. 1 egg was knocked off for the stock fan, it is loud under load and has a extremely annoying whine to it. Fan like all AMD stock fans was extremely disturbing to install, had to apply alot additional pressure on the motherboard than i would have liked to get the clips in place. excellent processor cant wait to see what this issue can seriously do, wish AMD would make superior stock fans.-AMD T1090 BE-4GB Gskill ripjaws DDR3 Ram-MSI ATI R5770 hawk graphics card-Western Digital ten,000 RPM 300 GB HD-Samsung 7200 RPM 500 GB HD -MSI 870A-G55 motherboard-Windows 7 sp1 64bit

Comment:
Quickly Trustworthy CPU, its gets warm but what do you expect it to do get cold?Neat AMD Core-line dock.. enables obtaining videos on the web actually uncomplicated. Not my factor >.< Lack of some documentation...Free AVG trail .. Tiny CD = winIts genuinely straightforward to shed, I lost it in the trash :D

Comment:
by no means truly goes above 20% usage!, extremely pleased! nothing amd vs i7, i will generally take amd now.identical goes for my nvidia vs ati transformation, i will constantly favor ati and amd, Amazing COMBO!

Comment:
- Amazing efficiency though it lasted.- Uncomplicated installation.- Past four months showed improvement from my final CPU. - Quickly fragile when moving cpu from a single motherboard to a different. - Pins are incredibly fragile when moving CPU from one board to yet another.- Pins were nonetheless in the old motherboard when I was upgrading mobo. - Extremely disappointed and AMD wont take it back given that they dont ship to APO addresses. - That actually sucks to invest this significantly on a processor to discover out that I can't get it repaired or something. Waste of 240 bux Going Intel for now... disappointed that a brand new CPU much less than 5 months old and the pins ripped out from in the mobo. Happened following unlocking the fan. All I necessary is my mobo to say OMNOMNOM :/ Other than that, it was a very good cpu, but make confident that if you program to obtain a 1090T, make sure its in a motherboard that you wont ever have to upgrade. Previous motherboard: ASUS M4A78T-E New (well returning given that i didn't open it): ASUS Crosshair IV

Comment:
+WOW! Noticeably more rapidly than my AMD720 ʃ.6ghz. WAY quicker than a 939 single or dual core. Way more quickly.ƱdMark Benchmarks doubled in CPU overall performance from preceding CPU. +Uses your prior DDR2 or DDR3 Memory and motherboard. Most AM2 will run this soon after a straightforward BIOS flash.+Smoother in-game. Frames went from 55fps to 75fps in Bad Company2 and loading time is half now. 1st 1 in the server.+Overclocks like a champ. 4ghz is super effortless & stable. slightly quicker in game, but honestly overclocking not necessary or noticed efficiency boost. Runs fast as-is. The 1100t is not worth the additional money.+ slows down to 800mhz when webbrowsing. super cool and energy efficient. +Super good value. Can you believe its only 赨??? Remember a couple of years ago? This would have been 񘈨 in the FX days.+Seriously, dont read about it, even if you have a Quad, this is worth it. I wasnt organizing upgrading, but this was worth it. -Not as fast as the new Intel Sandybridge stuff. check out the 2500k-Not ever program utilizes all the cores. Runs as dual core in older games, and most Apps. Overclocking doesnt seem to actually support anything due to the fact is runs at 20% every single core according to my gadgets.-still a Phenom II, not subsequent generation design seriously.-Uses much more voltage than my AMD 720, and doesnt have any secret unlockable cores. Operating on a Asus M3N-HT mobo, with DDR2 and appears DDR3 is only a different three% more rapidly or 2fps in-game. This is excellent investment that future-proofs my setup for at least yet another two or three years, and utilizes my present hardware. Drop in. You dont Need to have this if you have a dual core, or quad... but you will see slightly more rapidly at every thing. It could be worth it to appear at SSD for your C: or a newer graphics card. GTX 480륮 used are going for much less than 赨 If your purchasing all new motherboard and CPU, the Intel 2500k is the exact same price tag, has onboard GPU and overclocks to four.8ghz on air. Worth a look. I wonder if you will notice a difference over this six core AMD at 4ghz. Both are quicker than the Apps can manage.Honestly

Comment:
Stupid rapidly! Overclocked to 4GHz 鴜x18 ʁ.475v) extremely effortlessly and is not overheating on the stock cooler. 7.5 WEI and overnight stable with Prime 95, 6 threads. The stock cooler is a bit lacking and does not seem to do so well under load. I strongly recommend upgrading to a better cooler if you are running a decent case, maybe water if you have the will to do so. Great performance for significantly much less than it's Intel counterparts.

Comment:
i have had this processor for about a week and a half now and it is awesome. its in fact a three.6GHZ Turbo Core from the factory when i received it even though its only rated at three.2GHZ. the black edition part is cool if you know what to do with it, if you acquire the correct motherboard with Core Unlocker Technoligy you can not only overclock this safely to four.2GHZ but unlock 6 additional cores so its like having 12. just about every time i boot it seems to shut one particular core off but i feel its due to the fact i have to little of a power provide so i got a new one on the way 800watt instead of 550W. im operating this processor with Nvidia GTS450 1GB DDR5, 8GB of DDR3, one particular 2TB HD, 1 1TB HD, 1 300GB HD, 1 external 500GB HD, four DVD/RW Drives, wireless card, Ati 650 pro Dual Television Tuner, on a ASUS MB M4A87TD/USB three